Concord Breakfast Toastmasters
Club Project:
Annual Awards Celebration

(jump to 2005 notes)

Overview

February 19th, 2005, Concord Breakfast Toastmasters #2056 celebrated its second annual awards celebration. The purpose is to honor our members who have served our club above and beyond that which is called for in the “Toastmaster Promise”. Award nominees are to be voted on in January for the previous calendar year.

Awards

Our first year, a ballot was sent out via email to all club members by then club president and awards chairperson Gina Chenoweth. The seven proposed awards were:

Our second year, the awards committee provided each club member with a ballot proposing the following seven awards:

Project Timeline

November:

December: (December is, historically, a short month since the club normally doesn't meet the weeks which include Christmas and New Year's holidays)

January:

The Committees

Event Committee

The Event Committee is charied by the club member who has been nominated and voted by the club, or who otherwise has come to accept the chairmanship for this committee. Other members of this committee are the chairs of the event sub-committees. For the 2004 awards, Lee Woods was Event Committee Chair and used the opportunity to earn her Leadership Excellence Award - a requirement to earn her Advanced Leader recognition, which, in turn, is a requirement to earn a Distinguished Toastmasters recognition.

What We Did

On October 26th, 2004, Lee Woods sent the following message to the club's Executive Committee: It isn't too early to start planning the next event for our club. It is our hope that each year, we will hold an Awards Dinner. The following are suggestions for the above for your review, input, suggestions or whatever -
  1. When - A suggestion was made the event could be held shortly after the super bowl. Possibly in the evening.
  2. Where - There are several restuarants in our area which could accomodate such an event.
  3. Program - Suggestion was made for a keynote speaker. One suggestion that a contact be made with a special Humor type club in Oakland (?) My suggestion was that we ask someone within the District to be the Toastmaster for the evening. Although we have plenty of talent within our own club.
  4. Have the whole club involved and set up various committees for the above items. Thinking possibly of someone who is knowledgeable about the restuarants in our area, e.g., Grace Ellis, Mary Beth Deans. That person and committee would be responsible for locating the restuarant and making sure everything is in readiness the evening of the event.
  5. Have each of us, the Exec Committee, involved in one of these committees as well.
  6. Mike Elliott is a professional musician and when asked he said he would be pleased to put something together. His portion would be an audience participation and could be done in approximately 15 minutes.
  7. Should a short TM demonstration, e.g., like last Tuesday, table topics, etc.?
  8. A committee for the awards.
  9. Part of 2 above - what price range?
  10. Should our spouses or partners be invited? What about the people who were our guests last week? I think there should be no free dinners and that all attending should pay.
  11. What inviting important people from the District? Area Governor, Division Governor and District Governor? Or anyone else?
  12. Should invitations be printed and sent out to the people in item 11? I have found in my experience in doing this type of thing that it's a good idea to get it planned early so that if there are any last minute changes, etc., they will be easier to handle.
I would say that's enough for now. Please give this Dinner some thought. Since we aren't having any Exec Committee meetings for now, what about meeting after one of the upcoming regular TM meetings?

Lee J. Woods

Ideas for Improvement

One problem was the late date at which a final event date was selected. Programs, Invitiations and Hospitality committees were unable to move forward until this date was set. It has been suggested that for future events, we simply set is as the weekend before SuperBowl.

Another logjam to the smooth flow was in lack of co-ordination between different committees. It has been suggested that for future events, the Event Committee meet at least once-a-month to learn what each other's committees are doing.

Awards Committee

The Awards Committee consists of the Awards Committee Chair, and at least two volunteers from the club (plus, possibly, one or more independent third parties -- see "Ideas for Improvement" below).

The Awards Committee is charged with:

What We Did

On December 8, 2004, Elisabeth Andreason, Awards Committee Chair, sent the following email to the club's Executive Committee:

"I have accepted to task of collecting nominations for awards. I just want to be sure that I am clear on criteria so that I may explain if asked. I also wanted to pose to the Committee a few suggestions to fill the blank "other" spaces at the bottom of the page.

Most Improved Leader - is this open to the entire club? How do you measure an improvement in leadership? We happen to have an interesting situation where literally half of our members are new members, and so do not have a history to base their decision on. I have been around for over a year and I am not even sure how to determine who is most improved in leadership. Is this an award others feel strongly about, or may I suggest we replace it with something else?

Most Active Inside the Club - Is it fair to think half the club - especially new members have any idea what goes on behind the scenes and how much work various members are doing. Is this not an overlap with the Executive Committee Award? The Executive Committee probably knows best who does the most work inside the club. I think it is a great idea to have them identify someone who needs special recognition for doing something the rest of the club is probably not aware of.

I like the Most Improved Speaker, Most Dependable, and New Member Awards.

I also noticed a few blank spaces for "Other" awards at the bottom of the page. I would like to suggest a few to add that I feel even new members will have a opinion about.

Back By Popular Demand Awards - If you were bringing a guest to a meeting and you wanted to make a good impression by hand picking who would play all the major roles that require preparation - who would you choose?

  1. Who would choose to be in the Speaker line-up - who you know will offer something, either entertaining or educational, and engaging in the sense that we the audience will either walk away with something to think about or a new technique that we would like to add to our own repertoire?
  2. Who would you choose to be Toastmaster - that can project their voice well, demonstrate confidence, organization and professionalism - so that your guest will say - "Yeah, I want to run a meeting like that".
  3. Who would you choose to lead Table Topics - that can make the exercise truly something all members and especially guests feel welcome and safe to participate in - who encourages folks to do what they came to Toastmasters for - to practice speaking in a comfortable not threatening setting - and they get the sense that anything they say even if it is just introducing themselves is a successful execution of the exercise."

For the 2003 awards, custom engraved plaques were purchased from a local trophies shop; For the 2004 awards, acrylic desk-top awards were ordered from Toastmasters International.

Ideas for Improvement

There is a challenge in keeping members of the awards committee, who may, themselves, be receiving an award, unaware of who the winners are. It has been suggested that one or more independent third parties, perhaps Area, Division or District officers, be the ones to receive and count ballots, and even place the order for the trophies or plaques in order to maintain total secrecy for all club members.

Also, the award ballots had very little space to write in the name of the person a members wants to cast a vote for. One idea would be to provide a longer line. Another might be to take nominations from the floor prior to preparing the ballot so that names may be printed (along with "other" for a write-in candidate) with a checkbox next to each.

It has also been suggested that we include the Best Evaluator as one of the awards along the line of "Back By Popular Demand Awards".

Hospitality Committee

The Hospitality Committee consists of the Hospitality Committee Chair, and at least two volunteers from the club.

The Hospitality Committee is charged with:

What We Did

In 2004 (for the 2003 awards), a Saturday noon pot-luck was arranged at the Concord Police Department's Community Room. Cost - No Charge.

In 2005 (for the 2004 awards), a Saturday evening catered dinner was arranged at the Oakhurst Country Club in Clayton. The meal, with no desert, cost a little over $23 per person. Add tax and tip, and it came to pennies under $30 each.

Ideas for Improvement

While the atmosphere at Oakhurst Country Club was exceptional, compared to the Police Department, the cost of the meal kept several people away. Arrangements were made to accomodate those who chose not to pay for the meal by scheduling the event to begin after dinner, thus allowing members to arrive after dinner and enjoy the celebration.

Alternate ideas have also been discussed, including:

Program Committee

The Program Committee committee consists of the Program Committee Chair, and several volunteers from the club.

The Program Committee is charged with:

What We Did

In 2005 (for the 2004 awards) an outside Toastmaster and Keynote Speaker were solicited so that all club members would be free to enjoy the evening. An eight-page (two 8 1/2" by 11" sheets folded over) program was designed and printed. This included:
  1. Cover - Toastmaster logo, event name and date;
  2. Blank
  3. Program agenda
  4. Choruses for sing-a-longs
  5. Awards list with descriptions and spaces to fill in names
  6. Blank
  7. Bios for Keynote Speaker, Toastmaster and Entertainers
  8. Blank

Ideas for Improvement

In 2004 (for the 2003 awards) the club President was the event's Toastmaster.

In 2005 (for the 2004 awards) the Awards Committee sought and obtained permission from the Executive Committee/Events Committee to present the awards to the winners. This was a deviation from the original plan of the Program Committee. The rationale by the Awards Committee was that an outside Toastmaster was not as familiar with the club members, and may not be able to present the awards with the deserved degree personal information, warmth and enthusiasm. The objection was that the spotlight would be on the club member who was presenting the award, in addition to the recipient, in direct contrast to the program plan of spotlighting only the club members who received the awards.

Different people still have different opinions on the above, and it seems to have distracted the committees from noticing other omissions:

Invitations Committee

The Invitations Committee committee consists of the Invitations Committee Chair, and several volunteers from the club.

The Invitations Committee is charged with:

What We Did

A one-sheet, four-panel (folded over, then folded again in gift-card fashion) invitation was created, containing the following information:
  1. Graphics and purpose
  2. Highlights of the event, RSVP request and procedure
  3. Where, When, Why and contact info
  4. Map to event

Ideas for Improvement

Additionally, Ken took several credit card charges through his business in payment for dinner purchases. Something like this should be part of the plan from the beginning.

 

 

Lessons Learned: 2005 Awards Dinner

Awards Dinner Committee (MB Deans)
What Worked:

What to Do Differently Next Year:

Hospitality Committee (Grace Ellis, Hope Ford)
What Worked:

What to Do Differently Next Year:

Invitations Committee (Sarah Cole, Gina Gotsill)
What Worked:

What to Do Differently Next Year:

Program Committee (Orval Mosby, Sarah Cole, Mike Elliott, Lee Woods)
What to Do Differently Next Year:

Awards Committee (Kanda Alahan, Mike McGarvey)
What to Do Differently Next Year: